A meeting of the Heddon on the Wall Parish Council Planning Committee was held on 7th January , 2002 commencing at 2.00pm, in the Green Room of the Knott Memorial Hall.

PRESENT: Planning Committee Members Dr. B.J. Selman (Chairman), Mr. I. Armstrong, Mr. B. Tailford. Mr M. Iley.Other Councillors ; Mrs H. Thompson, Mrs Cruickshank

Three residents of Heddon banks attended this meeting. They were invited to comment on this application by the Chairman

APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE. The full Planning Committee were present.

MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING

These had been approved at the full Parish Council Meeting held on the 5th December, 2001

APPLICATIONS

01/D/756, Mr R.T. Dees, 44 Heddon Banks, Heddon on the Wall, NZ 130 664, Conversion of one dwelling house into two dwelling houses and extension to the ground and first floor to provide conservatory, kitchen and garage and conversion of utility and garage on lower floor to kitchen dining room , living room and hall and the erection of a detached garage.

The residents of Heddon Banks who were present stated that they had no objections to the development. A letter was received from another resident of Heddon Banks making strong objections to the development on the grounds of loss of amenity, being overlooked and also potential traffic problems.

The Plans for this development were incomplete as they did not show the presence of a room over the garage, which was obviously there nor did they show the access to the site. After some discussion it was decided to adjourn this meeting until the complete plans had been received.

A meeting was held on Wednesday, 30th January 2002 between he Allotment Holders on the Heddon on the Wall Allotment site and the Parish Council Allotments Committee. The meeting was held in the Supper Room of the Knott Memorial Hall and commenced at 7.30pm.

Present: The Parish Council Allotments Committee, Dr B.J. Selman, Mr I Armstrong, Mr B. Tailford, and Mr R Young. The Clerk to the Parish Council Mr T. Bates was also present. Dr Selman and Mr Tailford are also Allotment Holders.

Allotment Holders Mr G. Wilson, Miss L. Hogarth, Mr N. Donnison, Mr E.Armstrong, Mr B. Phipps, Mr J. Banks, Mr J. Muse, Mr P. McFarlane, Mr S. Gibson

The meeting was chaired by Mr I. Armstrong.

CHAIRMAN’S WELCOME

The Chairman, Mr Armstrong, welcomed the Allotment holders to the meeting.

RENT

Without delay the meeting progressed to the first item, the Allotment Rent. One allotment holder stated that he understood that the rents would go down when the Parish Council took over. There was some discussion on this and it was pointed out that the cost of water would be a major financial item to be met from the rents. It was agreed to leave the rent at £30 per year until a realistic figure for water costs could be obtained. There were no objections to the Parish Council system of two payments of £15 every six months.

TENANCY AGREEMENT

The Tenancy Agreement proposed by the Parish Council was discussed clause by clause. Although there was some discussion on individual items the Tenancy Agreement as proposed by the Parish Council was accepted in its entirety.

FORMATION OF AN ALLOTMENT HOLDERS ASSOCIATION

This item caused a significant amount of discussion. Views were stated both for the formation of such an association and against. In the main the feeling of the allotment holders was against such a move. It was felt that they were there as Gardeners not as administrators. No vote was taken but it was plain that the main feeling of the meeting was against the proposition.

ANY OTHER BUSINESS RELEVANT TO THE ALLOTMENTS

There was no other business

The Chairman declared the meeting closed at about 9.00pm

A meeting of Heddon on the Wall Parish Council was held on Wednesday, 13^th March, 2002, in Heddon Library commencing at 7.30pm.

PRESENT Dr. Selman (Chairman), Mr. Armstrong, Mr. Young, Mr Watson, Mrs Thompson, Mrs. Cruickshank, Mr Iley Mr. Tailford, County Councillor Bentham, and the Clerk (Mr. T. Bates)

Visitor: There were three members of the public present

APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE

Apologies for absence were received from Borough Councillor Avery

MINUTES OF THE LAST MEETING

The minutes of the Parish Council Meeting held on 13^th February 2002 had been previously circulated. They were approved and signed.

MATTERS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES

Mr Armstrong gave an up-date on the latest developments on the Common. BTCV were now prepared to help. They were going to work on nine days in April, There would be a preliminary day on the 24^th March when fencing would be arranged to stop horse riders coming into the Butterfly area. Most of the work to be done would be stone work, in particular, the installation of the new stone seat. This would be difficult to man handle onto the site. Once it was in position anyone who wanted to could carry out carving on the seat, as was done with the stepping stone path. It was proposed to place a post in the entry to the cut but it was agreed that this should be removable to allow wheelchair access. There was some discussion on the condition of the Common paths being used for the May 1^st Walk. It was also mentioned that the new signpost which had been erected on the Common was pointing the wrong way.

DISTRICT REPORT

In his absence, Councillor Avery submitted a written report. This was discussed and it is included in these minutes.

COUNTY REPORT

Councillor Bentham had isolated five items which he thought would be of interest. The First School, in North Road Ponteland was changing. The plot it occupies was to be sold and a new school was to be built in the grounds of the Coates Endowed School. The A696 was to be de-trunked. This was causing real problems, the anticipation being that maintenance would suffer. Traffic calming in the Local Transport Plan for 2002 � 2003 had six projects for Castle Morpeth, but none of these was in Heddon. Area Committees had now been set up. Heddon was in the Castle Morpeth Area Committee. Parts of the Highways Budget were to be delegated to Area Committees on a trial basis throughout 2002 � 2003. The idea was to promote the opportunity to" directly influence service provision within geographical areas" Revenue of �300,000 has been approved as part of the 2002 - 2003 budget. Of this Castle Morpeth would receive �45,000. This amount would not go very far in Castle Morpeth. A Criminal Law Enforcement Policy had been adopted, and it was surprising what N.C.C. was responsible for in this respect.

6) ACCOUNTS

Received:

Bank Interest, Bank of Ireland � 215.37

Dividend Charibond, Village Trust � 1.06

Dividend Charibond, Village Trust � 57.29

Dividend Charifund, Village Trust � 135.80

Donation from N.C.C for use of photographs � 70.00

To pay:-

Clerk�s Salary, Mr. T. Bates � 241.37

Handyman, Mr. T. Evans � 72.00

Eversheds, final payment for Allotments purchase � 293.58

Knott Hall use of rooms � 6.00

Petty cash � 100.00

PLANNING

Decisions

01/D/756 J.T. Dees, 44, Heddon banks, Heddon on the Wall

Considerable developments at this address. PERMITTED with conditions

02/D/86 P.J. Boyd, 274, Hexham Road, Heddon on the Wall NZ 144 669.

Extension to kitchen and a first floor extension to provide an additional bathroom. The above item was discussed at the Planning Committee meeting held on 6^th March 2002. and there were no objections. The minutes of this meeting were approved and signed and are included with these minutes.

01/D/509, Wimpey Homes,10, Station Road, Heddon on the Wall.

Considerable developments at this site. PERMITTED, with a large number of Conditions. The conditions which have been applied appear to meet most requirements which were initially requested. There has been an attempt by CMBC to achieve some planning gain for the community but so far there has been no response from Wimpey.

For Discusion

02/D/114, Priorspur Ltd, 5, Taberna Close, Heddon on the Wall. NZ 132 668

Alteration to shop front to reduce glazing area.

This was discussed and some concern was expressed at the obvious change in appearance which would result. However there were no grounds for opposing this development. It was decided not to object but to raise the concerns of the Council regarding the change in appearance which would result.

ANNUAL MEETING BETWEEN THE BOROUGH AND PARISH COUNCILS

The Councils views on the change of format of the annual meeting between the CMBC and Parish Councils had been requested. The Chairman gave a brief history of this meeting. It was his opinion that the new format was better than the old one and the meeting should continue in this form.

9) HEDDON ON THE WALL VILLAGE FETE, MONDAY 26^TH AUGUST 2002

The Village fete was being organised again this year and the Parish Council has been invited to take part. There were a number of suggestions as to what form this could take. It was agreed that the Parish Council would take part, probably with an exhibition illustrating the work of the Parish Council.

COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE COMMISSION FOR RACIAL EQUALITY

The Commission for Racial Equality had sent to the Council the Statutory Codes of Practice for Local Authorities and also for Educational Establishments. Those pertaining to Local Authorities apply to Heddon Parish Council. These were discussed and the difficulties which could arise from this document were mentioned. The accompanying questionnaire was actually outdated before the document was received.

QUEEN�S JUBILEE CELEBRATIONS

A survey of the village organisation had been conducted to discover their plans for celebrating the Queen�s Jubilee. Only ten had replied and of these only two had plans for the event. Several indicated that they would be pleased to help others. Mrs Laws and Mr Hotchikiss were invited to contribute to the discussion. Mr Hotchkiss represented St Andrews Church and the Ad Murum Singers whilst Mrs Laws represented the Womens' Institute. The Church was happy to take part whilst the Ad Murum Singers would be very happy to contribute items to the general celebrations. The W. I. was prepared to cater for any events which may be held. Mrs Laws also suggested the placing of a Jubilee Seat in the Welfare Field as part of the celebrations. There was a general discussion. It was agreed to hold a meeting as soon as possible with all of the Village organisations in order to attempt to progress this matter.

DEVELOPMENTS ON THE WELFARE FIELD AND THE PROPOSED SPORTS FIELD

An Exhibition of the various proposals for the Welfare Field had been held on the week end of 9^th and 10^th March 2002. 85 people had attended and filled in Opinion Survey forms. These forms were to be evaluated by CMBC so results were not yet available. Councillor Bentham gave his account of his dealings with the Asset Management department of N.C.C. A letter had been received from Mr Price of Asset Management. This for the first time allowed the Parish Council access into the N.C.C. owned field to the south of the proposed playing field. The Parish Council could provide a "safe Access" footpath/cycle way in this field, running from the A69 slip road to the sports field. There were some conditions but these were not thought to be unreasonable. The same letter also detailed his preferred option for vehicular access into this field. He preferred "Option 1" for this, which entailed using the present gateway and removing the hedges of "Deneholme" to achieve the necessary visibility splays. It would appear that there was, at least, some misunderstanding as to the position of Mr Young with regard to his hedges. It was agreed that this option was unacceptable. Mr Young (jr) was requested to contact Asset Management and state the positions of both himself and his father on this matter. It was also agreed that a letter be sent outlining the Parish Council�s position and pointing out that the difference in the amount of land required between Option 1 (i.e. using the existing access) and "Option 2" (using a new entrance 10 metres south of the present entrance) was small when it was considered that with "Option 2" the footpath would be shorter.

TO FILL A CASUAL VACANCY ON THE PARISH COUNCIL

It was agreed that one candidate would not be further considered because he did not wish to compete with any other candidate for the post. This left only one applicant. It was unusual in this particular case in that the candidate was not known to anyone present. It was agreed that he should be asked to attend the next Council meeting in order that he could make himself known to the Council.

TO SET A DATE FOR THE ANNUAL ELECTORS MEETING

The suggested date was 1^st May, but there were some reservations about having the meeting on this date. There was some reluctance to have the meeting on this date. It was decided to try to obtain an alternative venue and to have the meeting in that week, but not necessarily on the 1^st May.

CORRESPONDENCE

Northumberland Foot and Mouth Enquiry report was tabled

Local Council Review was tabled

Community Council news was tabled.

Castle Morpeth Best Value Summary Newsletter. This was to be circulated to Councillors.

Mayor�s Charity events.

A notice from Building Control regarding all new glazing installations having to conform to strict thermal standards.

ANY OTHER BUSINESS

It was reported that Roman remains had been found in the trench which was being dug for the new water main.

Press reports regarding the new Parish Councillors Register of Interest were discussed.

The problem of inconsiderate parking on the junction of Marius Avenue and Towne Gate .was raised by Mrs Laws. The possibility of placing double yellow lines on this junction was suggested as a possibility. This discussion proceeded into the condition of all of the white lining in the village. It was considered that all of it was in a poor condition and required renewing.

The condition of the road leading to Hillhead was raised. It was stated that this was a matter between CMBC and the residents at Hillhead.

There being no further business the Chairman declared the meeting closed at about 9.00pm.

A meeting of Heddon on the Wall Parish Council was held on Wednesday, 10^th April 2002, in Heddon Library commencing at 7.30pm.

PRESENT Dr. Selman (Chairman), Mr. Armstrong, Mr. Young, Mr Tailford Mr Watson, Mrs Thompson, Mrs. Cruickshank, District Councillor Avery, and the Clerk (Mr. T. Bates)

Visitors: Mr Ayliffe, Mrs Laws, and (part time) representatives from the Three Tuns

APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE

Apologies for absence were received from Mr Iley, and Mrs Thompson. Councillor Bentham was also unable to attend.

MINUTES OF THE LAST MEETING

The minutes of the Parish Council Meeting held on 13^th March 2002 had been previously circulated. They were approved and signed.

MATTERS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES

The Clerk mentioned that, on the advice of NALC, no action need be taken about the publications from the Commission on Racial Equality. It was also mentioned that the incorrect signpost on the Common was now pointing in the correct direction. The stone seat to be placed on the Butterfly would be moved by a volunteer who is resident in the village.

DISTRICT REPORT

Councillor Avery gave a further instalment on the Section11 Notice served on the District Councillor by the Auditors, and the Auditors response was awaited. New "swipe" cards had been sent out to enable tenants to pay rent at post offices. Unfortunately there had been hitches. The door to door rent collection has been stopped because of the safety and insurance problems. The Rural Strategic Partnership had been re-launched. The initial meeting had been a valuable meeting. The Partnership was looking for more partners, such as different organisations which have not so far been included. Nominations for a Chairman and a Vice-chairman are also being sought. Non-elected members are required for these posts to demonstrate that the Partnership is not local government dominated. Councillor Avery intended to circulate various proformas. The Partnership was now a community of rural communities such as Heddon and Stamfordham. Contractors were being sort to run the Housing Maintenance programme.

COUNTY REPORT

In the absence of Councillor Bentham no County Report was presented.

ACCOUNTS

Received:

Precept �20,000.00

Bank Interest, Bank of Ireland � 207.30

Allotment rents to date � 187.50

Building Society interest, Village Trust account � 520.00

To pay:-

Clerks salary, Mr T. Bates � 300.00

Handyman, Mr T. Evans � 76.00

Knott Hall for NTC performance � 30.00

Northumberland and Newcastle Society Membership � 15.00

The above were accepted for payment. A cheque for �420 was drawn on the Bank of Ireland

PLANNING

For Discussion

02/D/179, I. Moore, Holmside Farm, East Heddon. Construction of a Sun Room

This was discussed and there were NO OBJECTIONS

The matter of the developments at Remus Avenue was discussed. This development does not require Planning Permission as it is smaller than 70 cubic meters in size.

TO FILL A CASUAL VACANCY ON THE PARISH COUNCIL

There were two candidates and they were asked to attend this Council meeting. They each gave a short presentation on their points of view. Both candidates stayed for the full length of the meeting. At the end of the Council meeting the candidates withdrew and the Council had some further discussion on the merits of each candidate, followed by a secret paper ballot. Mr Barry Ayliffe was the successful candidate, and he was to be invited to join the Parish council.

SUPPLY OF DOG WASTE BINS

A private contractor had offered to supply and empty dog waste bins. There were offers to either rent or purchase the bins followed by a fee for emptying the bins, both prices depending on size. It was decided to cost this project out and make the decision then. It was remarked that the bins in Ponteland for which CMBC was responsible were not being emptied.

GRAVEYARD EXTENSION USING THE COUNCIL OWNED LAND ON CHARE BANK

English Heritage had been contacted and their reply was now to hand. The land in question could not be used as a graveyard. However there was no objection to the area being tidied up by the removal of surface vegetation. It was decided to contact Bays Leap Farm again about the area of land between the Throckley road and the A69 slip road.

QUEEN�S JUBILEE CELEBRATIONS

A meeting of village organisations was held on 22^nd March and a provisional programme was devised. Mrs Laws, chairman of that meeting gave a resume of the programme. There was some discussion on the length of some items in the concert programme but it was decided to leave these precise details to the next meeting of this committee which was to be held on the 19^th April. The Three Tuns had a programme for the Sunday June 2^nd in the Memorial Park. Some reservations were expressed about this programme. A detailed programme had been provided by the Three Tuns management, and this was discussed. Guarantees were offered with regard to safety and cleanliness. There was general approval of the programme. The Parish Council gave formal approval to the plans for the use of the Memorial Park. The provision of fireworks was discussed. It was decided to finance a firework display to a total cost of �1000, which would include a contingency fund for the celebrations in general. It was decided to place this topic on the agenda for the next Parish Council meeting. Mrs Laws agreed to chair the next meeting of the Jubilee Committee.

CASTLE MORPETH PLAYING PITCH STRATEGY

A full copy of this document had been received.

DEVELOPMENTS ON THE WELFARE FIELD AND THE SPORTS FIELD

No answer had been received from N.C.C regarding the vehicular access to the Sports field even though they had been contacted twice. It was decided to contact the County Councillor to progress this matter further. The spreadsheet for the assessment of the data collected at the Welfare Field exhibition had been received from CMBC, but there had been no time to carry out an evaluation. This would be done for the next meeting.

COMMUNICATION FROM THE AUDIT COMMISSION REGARDING "LIGHT TOUCH" AUDIT.

A complex document had been received from the Audit Commission. This document was discussed. NALC had been contacted about this new Audit system, and they had been in touch with the Audit Commission making various objections to the new proposals and this letter was read out. NALC also advised that Heddon Parish Council also contacts the Audit Commission and in addition write to the local M.P. It was decided to follow this advice.

ALLOTMENT BANK ACCOUNT

It was decided to set up a separate bank account for the Allotment Funds. There was some discussion on problems at the allotments such as the broken gatepost and the rats.

DATE FOR THE ANNUAL ELECTORS MEETING

It was decided that this would be on Wednesday, May 1^st 2002. Mr Armstrong would chair this meeting.

HEDDON COMMON

Various problems appear to occurring on the Common. Some of these are associated with use of the Common by horse riders. This use was causing damage to the Common paths. Some of the local youth were building "dens" and making a bike track. It was decided that the Common bridal ways should be sign posted and fences placed to keep horses off the footpaths. There was some discussion as to the form the sign posts should take and their location.

CORRESPONDENCE

A letter from Alan Michael, M.P. regarding government support for Parish Councils was tabled

Community Council for Northumberland Invitation to the Spring Meeting on 30^th April.

Responses to the Northumberland National Park and County Structure Plan

An invitation to the Parish Council to take part in the Heddon Flower Festival.

A letter from a resident regarding the speed limit on Hexham Road, leading from Heddon to Throckley. The resident requested that the speed limit be lowered. It was decided to support this.

ANY OTHER BUSINESS

The Chairman reported that the Getty Trust was visiting Heddon to research the problems created by the Hadrian�s Wall World Heritage Site.

Problems of holes in the road in Trajan Walk were mentioned.

A resident had had a tripping accident on Remus Avenue. This had been reported to N.C.C. What further action the resident contemplated was uncertain.

There being no further business the Chairman closed the meeting at about 9.15pm

The Annual Meeting of Heddon on the Wall Parish Council was held on Wednesday, 8^th May 2002, in Heddon Library commencing at 7.30pm.

PRESENT Dr. Selman (Chairman), Mr. Armstrong, Mr. Young, Mr Watson, Mrs Thompson, Mrs. Cruickshank, Mr Tailford, Mr Iley, Mr Ayliffe, District Councillor Avery, and the Clerk (Mr. T. Bates)

Visitors: Mrs Laws, Mr Scott

APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE

Apologies for absence were received from County Councillor Bentham

APPOINTMENT OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE PARISH COUNCIL

Dr. Brian Selman was nominated and seconded. There were no other nominations. Dr Selman was appointed Chairman of the Parish Council.

APPOINTMENT OF THE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN OF THE PARISH COUNCIL

Mr Ian Armstrong was nominated and seconded. There were no other nominations. Mr Armstrong was re-appointed as Deputy Chairman of the Parish Council.

APPOINTMENT OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS

Planning Committee The previous Planing Committee were willing to stand and they were re-appointed. They are Dr Selman, Mr Armstrong, Mr Tailford and Mr Iley

Allotments Committee The previous Allotments Committee were prepared to stand and they were re-appointed. They are Dr Selman, Mr Armstrong, Mr Tailford, and Mr Young

Airport Liason Mr Armstrong was prepared to carry on in this post and he was re-appointed

Knott Hall Committee representative Mrs Thompson was prepared to continue in this post and she was re-appointed

School Governers Representative Dr Selman was re-appointed to this post.

NALC Representative Mr Ayliffe was nominated for this position and he ws appointed.

MINUTES OF THE LAST MEETING

The minutes of the Parish Council Meeting held on 10^th April 2002 had been previously circulated. They were approved and signed.

MATTERS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES

A reply had been received from the Audit Commission regarding the "Light Touch" audit regime.

DISTRICT REPORT

Councillor Avery gave an account of the implementation of the new CMBC Political Management System, which it was hoped would be in operation very soon. The new Constitution was now available and this would be the basis for the new system. With this Council Meeting coming so soon after the Annual Electors Meeting, at which Councillor Avery gave a comprehensive review of the situation at CMBC Councillor Avery said that at this time there was very little else to report.

COUNTY REPORT

In the absence of Councillor Bentham there was no County Report

ACCOUNTS

Received:

Interest, Bank of Ireland � 250.47

VAT refund � 1131.32

Interest, Co-operative Bank � 1.52

Dividend, 2.5% Consolidated, Memorial Park Account � 13.00

Interest, Memorial Park account � 0.22

Allotment rents � 37.50

To pay:

Clerk�s Salary, Mr. T. Bates � 300.00

Handyman, Mr. T. Evans � 89.25

Knott Hall Committee, Hall hire for Welfare Field Exhibition � 62.00

Northumberland County Libraries, Library Hire � 100.00

Donald Gunn, stonemason, for Dragonfly Mosaic � 1000.00

Mr C. Rand, grass cutting, paid from Memorial Park account � 28.00

A cheque for �1580 was drawn on the Bank of Ireland to cover these expenses

QUEEN�S JUBILEE CELEBRATIONS

At the previous meeting of the Parish Council it had been agreed that the Council would fund the Celebrations up to a total of �1000. A brief summary of the events to be held was given by Mrs Laws. Fireworks and Bunting had been ordered. There was further discussion over the mechanism of financing the event, and some preliminary costs were presented. It was agreed to reimburse the two public houses with a donation of 100 each, and the Council would pay for the use of the Knott Hall on both Saturday and Sunday. The motion to fund the Celebrations to a sum of �1000 was formally proposed, seconded and agreed unanimously. There was further discussion and it was agreed that the Clerk would be given authority to pay bills as they were presented.

PLANNING

Decisions

02/D/86, P.J. BOYD, 274 HEXHAM ROAD, HEDDON ON THE WALL

Extension to Kitchen, and first floor extension to provide an additional bathroom

PERMITTED

For Discussion

02/D/192 Clark Scott Harden, Bays Leap Farm Heddon on the Wall

Erection of a cattle housing shed.

This development was not objected to, but an attempt was made to achieve some planning gain.

The above items were discussed at the Planning Committee meeting held on 24^th April 2002. The Minutes of this meeting had been circulated and they were accepted and signed They are included with these minutes.

Decisions

02/D/114, 5, Taberna Close, Heddon on the Wall.

Alteration to shop front to reduce glazing area. PERMITTED

For Discusion

02/D/238, B. Batey, 17, Station Road, Heddon on the Wall, NZ 136 666

Erection of a Conservatory. This application was discussed and there were no objections to the development.

02/D/192 Clark Scott Harden, Bays Leap Farm Heddon on the Wall

Further correspondence presented and there was discussion on the matter of the planning gain at this meeting

PROPOSED NEW CROSSING OF THE TYNE

It had come to the attention of Mr Armstrong that meetings had been held in Wylam, Prudhoe and Horsley to discuss the possibility of a new Tyne crossing at Ovingham/Prudhoe. He had attended the Wylam meetimg. Mr Armstrong gave a brief summary of the meeting. It transpired that the whole project was being driven by one County Councillor. There did appear to be opposition to the scheme. The County was carrying out a survey of Ovingham bridge to determine its remaining life span.. The County road plan has been fixed for the next four years and the replacement bridge will be so expensive that Government approval will be required. This project is unlikely to happen in the immediate future. However it is as well to be informed that such a project is being considered as it could have a considerable effect on Heddon if the wrong option is chosen. It was decided to invite Mr Greg Perks from the Northumberland County Council Environmental Directorate to address the Parish Council on this topic.

PROVISION OF DOG WASTE BINS

A private contractor had supplied prices for the installation and servicing of dog waste bins in Heddon. Detailed costing had been worked out. The CMBC Consolidated Estimates had been examined and there did not appear to be any provision for dog waste collection. It was agreed that dog waste bins were desirable but they had to be supported by a good service. It was thought better that such a service is provided by CMBC. It was decided to investigate the situation and Councillor Avery agreed to help.

CRIME STOPPERS APPEAL FOR FUNDS

Crimestoppers were appealing for funds. It was agreed to donate �25 to this charity.

CMBC LOCAL PLAN - PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS

This very large document had been received for review. Some points very quickly emerged from a quick perusal. The problem with the Village Envelope on the South side of the village was mentioned and it was decided that this should be brought up It was decided that Dr Selman and Mr Armstrong would review the document on behalf of the Council.

CMBC CONSOLIDATED ESTIMATES

The CMBC Consolidated estimates had been received. They were to be reviewed by Mr Ayliffe

GOLDEN JUBILEE SERVICE, HEXHAM ABBEY

The Lord Lieutenancy of Northumberland was holding a special service in Hexham Abbey on the 2^nd June for the Queen�s Jubilee. It was decided that Mrs Thompson and Mrs Laws would attend on behalf of the Parish Council.

DEVELOPMENTS ON THE WELFARE FIELD AND THE PROPOSED SPORTS FIELD

The data collected at the Welfare Field Exhibition held in March had been analysed. The significance of the data was discussed and it was decided that it was sufficiently significant to justify moving forward on some of the more obvious points. It was decided to set up a small committee, which would include non-parish councillors, to co-ordinate this development.

An e-mail had been received from Mr Price of N.C.C. offering the access route and the footpath for the safe access into the proposed sports field at East Heddon. This offer appeared to clear the way for the planning permission to be finalised, and it was agreed to pursue this as soon as possible. Councillor Avery would assist in this.

CLOSURE OF THE RE-CYCLING SITE

The re-cycling site on the Mill Lane site had been closed at the request of Bays Leap Farm. This was because of the mis-use and fly tipping which had occurred. CMBC were negotiating with Bays Leap to find another site.

MAYOR�S SUNDAY SERVICE AND PARADE

The Mayor of CMBC was holding his annual parade and service in Mitford on the 19^th May. Parish Councillors are invited to attend.

N.C.C. LOCAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEMES.

The Local improvement Scheme operated by N.C.C required some suggestions for Capital Expenditure within Heddon. It was decided to raise the item again at the next meeting when Councillors had had some time to consider the matter.

ADOPTION OF THE MODEL CODE OF CONDUCT FOR PARISH COUNCILS

The Model Code of Practice had been circulated in time for Councillors to read the document. Mr Iley gave a summary of his understanding of a training scheme held at CMBC. He was of the opinion that it was only a formalisation of previous practice and it was a matter of common sense. It was formally proposed and seconded that Heddon on the Wall Parish Council adopt the Model Code of Conduct for Parish Councils. This was agreed unanimously.

CORRESPONDENCE

Hadrian�s Wall World Heritage Site News was tabled

Northumberland Community News was distributed

Vital Villages Newsletter was tabled

A Letter from Mr Watson regarding the closure of Slacks Plantation was read out and discussed. It was agreed that Mr Watson had little option but to close the area to the public. It was suggested that the Parish Council rent this area from Mr Watson. It was agreed that discussions should be held with Mr Watson to formalise this matter.

ANY OTHER BUSINESS

A resident expressed their horror at the hay bales which had appeared in the field adjacent to the houses in Station Road. Their concern was the possible encouragement of vermin. It was stated that the bales were there as part of normal agricultural business.

The Financial statements from the Knott Hall were available.

The chairman reported that he had met the Getty Trust in the village. They were carrying o

out a survey of World Heritage sites to assess their problems

Mr Armstrong pointed out that there was now a series of walks around various centres on the Roman Wall. Heddon featured on one of these and it had been walked by a party recently.

There being no other business the Chairman closed the meeting at 9.30pm.

A meeting of the Heddon on the Wall Parish Council Planning Committee was held on 20^th May, 2002 commencing at 9.30am, in the Green Room of the Knott Memorial Hall.

PRESENT: Planning Committee Members Dr. B.J. Selman (Chairman), Mr. B. Tailford..Other Councillors ; Mrs H. Thompson, Mrs Cruickshank

Two residents of North Shop Cottage attended this meeting.

APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE. Apologies were received from Mr Armstrong and Mr Iley

MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING

These had been approved at the full Parish Council Meeting held on the 8^th May 2002

DECISIONS

02/D/192 Bays Leap Farm, Heddon on the Wall

Erection of a cattle shed. PERMITTED WITH CONDITIONS

APPLICATIONS

02/D/267 E. Shanks & S. Morgan, 80, Trajan Walk, Heddon on the Wall, NZ 128 667

Extension to front of garage, demolition of rear of garage & utility room & erection of 2no bedrooms, sunroom and new kitchen

This application was discussed in detail. After some reservations about the forward extension of the garage it was decided that there were NO OBJECTIONS TO THIS APPLICATION, provided that the neighbours had been informed and that their views were considered.

02/D/269 K.J. O�Donnell, 292, Hexham Road, Heddon on the Wall NZ 143 669

Extension to provide garden room

After discussion it was agreed that there were NO OBJECTIONS to this proposal

02/D/272/273LBC A. Dixon, West Heddon Farm, Heddon on the Wall, NZ 122 687, 123 686

Change of use of agricultural building to stabling (16 boxes)

The residents of North Shop Cottage had submitted a copy of a letter which they had sent to CMBC. They were strongly opposed to this development. This application was a retrospective Planning Application for a development which had already occurred without permission. There appeared to be serious traffic implications due to the owners of the stabled horses visiting the stables at least twice per day. There was a detailed discussion of the effects of the increased traffic. During the discussion an alternative route into West Heddon Farm was considered.

It was decided that the traffic implications were sufficiently serious for the Parish Council to OBJECT to the development in its present form. An alternative access route was proposed, or alternatively improvements to the present access road should be carried out.

02/D/274 Mrs B. Donnison, 23, Military Road, Heddon on the Wall, NZ 132 670

Outline permission for 1 no. dwelling house

There were NO OBJECTIONS to this outline planning permission

A meeting of the Heddon on the Wall Parish Council Welfare Field Improvements Committee was held on Wednesday, 5^th June, in the Supper Room of the Knott Memorial Hall commencing at 9.30am

PRESENT Dr Selman, Mr Armstrong, Mr Watson, Mr Stewart, Mr Furlonger, Mr Scott, Mr Mullarkey, Borough Councillor Avery, Ms Bottrell (CMBC Sports Development Officer)

WELCOME TO MEMBERS

Dr Selman, the Parish Council Chairman, welcomed members to the first meeting of the Welfare Field Improvements Committee. He gave a brief account of the recent events in the story of the Welfare Field. He also gave a summary of the remit of this committee from the Parish Council, saying that the Committee had the ability to invite or co-opt anyone to be a member. He saw the Welfare Field as catering for the younger children, as this was a trust the Parish Council holds as it was given by the miners for the children of the village. The Committee could also decide to provide a Games area. Dr Selman saw this Committee as a "village" committee" not primarily a Parish Council Committee. He also hoped that there would be a Chairman and Vice Chairman who did not come from the Parish Council. He gave a summary of the remit which he saw this committee as having. This was to draw up plans, obtain grants and carry out the improvements. The Parish Council would provide the land as they were the Trustees of the Welfare Field. The Council would also provide some grants. Financially he envisaged a bank account being opened and the Parish Council would pay bills on behalf of the Committee.

DECLARATION OF INTERESTS AND ACCEPTANCE OF OFFICE.

New Government laws dealing with Local Government means that non Parish Council members of the Committee had to make Notification of Financial and Other Interests, and also to sign an undertaking to abide by the Code of Conduct adopted by Heddon on the Wall Parish Council. Unfortunately no forms for the Notification of Interests were available. It was promised that these would be obtained as soon as possible and circulated to members concerned. The Acceptance of Office forms would be signed at the next meeting, as this would be soon enough.

ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN

Mr Gordon Stewart was proposed and seconded as Chairman. He was appointed un-opposed. From this point the meeting was chaired by Mr Stewart. Mr Dale Mullarky was proposed and seconded as Vice-Chairman and he was elected unopposed.

DETERMINATION OF PRIORITIES

Before continuing with the meeting proper Mr Stewart, as Chairman, gave a further history of the Welfare Field, derived from the Heddon Web Site Dr Selman added further detail to this. Dr Selman made the point that on the eastern side of the field the boundary was not the wire fence, but the wall behind the fence. The house at the south end of the field had a licence from the Parish Council to cultivate the land between the wall and the fence. He also commented on the drainage problems which exist on the South end of the field. It was suggested that test holes be dug at this end of the field to explore the soil structure in this area. It was thought possible that the National Grid personnel who were currently working in the village might be prepared to help in this respect. Mr Watson was to investigate this. The problem of interpreting the findings was raised but it was thought that they would be self evident.

The analysis of data obtained from the Welfare Field Survey had been previously circulated and they were discussed.. The procedure for advertising the Exhibition and Survey was discussed. Comments were made on the very poor response, but it was said that this was about average for this sort of survey. Unfortunately the original data had been temporarily mislaid but it was promised that they would be available to the next meeting. The importance of carrying the community along with the Committee was emphasised.

There was some discussion on the "Further Comments" section of the Survey Form. The CMBC Sports Development Officer gave her observations on the relevance of these comments. In the end, not many of the comments said anything which was not taken into account in the body of the Survey. Only a small number of forms were returned with very negative comments.

At this point the Chairman gave his views on the Committee and how it would respond to the Survey. The Committee would be prepared to implement modify or reject any or all of the proposals listed in the Survey. Any future proposals which may be brought forward would also be considered. The residents must be kept continuously informed of the progress of this committee with the minutes available to the public. The importance of publicity was emphasised, the Heddon web site being particularly valuable. The use of newspapers, and further consultation were also mentioned. The Welfare Field is an area which is to be enjoyed by all who wish to visit. If decisions are taken to improve the Field in any way the views of all must be respected and any genuine concerns addressed. The facilities available locally must be considered, taking into account accessibility, including public transport provision. He wished to refute the suggestions, which were already in circulation throughout the village, that the proposals were just to be rubber stamped by this committee. In this context it was agreed that if test holes were to be dug on the field then the public must be informed in good time of the purpose of these works. The involvement of the residents in the decision making process was emphasised. The public should be allowed to comment on any plans.

It was agreed that the consensus of this meeting was that a return of 81 forms was as good as could have been expected, the voting process was fair and well advertised. The responses showed that the majority of people agreed with improvements being carried out. 79% of respondents would use the area for play purposes and 73% would use it for sport. Family activities were more difficult to identify. The review of the data from the survey was continued and the toddler play area was discussed, in the context of the school developing the top yard for as a play area for smaller children. Provision of extra seating was not a contentious issue but its type and positioning need very careful consideration. The actual terms of the Trust by which the Welfare Field was placed into the custody of the Parish Council were questioned. It was decided that it was essential to obtain a copy of the Trust Document itself It was decided to do this and circulate it in time for the next meeting

It was decided that the committee were in favour of increasing the seating. There was further discussion on the seating as to whether it was feasible to replace the present seats. It was thought possible that the Parish Council could finance this. The position of some seats was discussed, such as more seating for mothers around the play area. The advisability of replacing the seats rather than simply increasing them was considered. There was further discussion on the placement and design of the seats and bins, with Eastwood Park at Prudhoe being sited as an example. It was decided that details of the seating currently on the market be obtained. It was decided that a more logical approach would be to co-ordinate the seat placement with the overall plan for the field. The possible toddler play area was discussed and its positioning. Mr Mullarky was asked to investigate what should be done in this respect. The importance of long term maintenance was emphasised, but the difficulty and cost of routine maintenance was also pointed out. The Parish Council would have a commitment to maintain the facility. The allocation of space to the various facilities was discussed. Any of the major companies in this field would design a facility for the space allocated to it. Ms Bottrell offered to obtain a scale drawing of the Welfare Field in order that the proposed facilities could be allocated space. It would also show the existence of services. The police should also be kept informed about the developments as they had concerns over the attraction of the facilities. There was some discussion on this and the options with regard keeping the facilities locked or unlocked. Ms Bottrell offered to liase with John Thompson, CMBC Community Safety Officer over these developments.

The discussion moved onto the proposals for the sports pitch. The removal of the present goal posts was considered to be a priority. The type of sports pitch required generated some discussion and as a result the definition of a MUGA was given by Ms Bottrell. It was simply a multi use games area which can have a variety of surfaces and be fenced or unfenced. It usually had different line arrangements to accommodate a variety of ball games. The provision of tennis and volley ball facilities as part of a MUGA had problems with the provision of nets. Ms Bottrell gave as her opinion that there was a need for both a hard surface and a grass surface on the Welfare Field. She also gave the alternative types of fencing which could be incorporated. There was no such thing as a MUGA. The facility could be designed to accommodate what ever the community required. Mr Scott gave his ideas which were based on Eastwood Park at Prudhoe. There was some discussion as to how this scheme could be modified to suit Heddon. There was further discussion on the type of fencing which could be incorporated. Ms Bottrell offered to provide a drawing of the Welfare Field with an appropriate sized sports area superimposed on it. The apprehension of the local residents regarding fencing was discussed. It was pointed out that the existing 8 feet high chainlink fencing could be incorporated into a games area. Any further fencing could be landscaped to soften the effect. Fencing was essential from the health and safety point of view. If a child was injured on the playground part of the Welfare Field because of some activity being carried on in the Games area the consequences could be serious.

There was considerable further discussion upon what should be provided in terms of grass or hard playing surfaces.

COST AND FUNDING

Ms Bottrell gave a summary of the possible costs but emphasised that costing depended entirely upon the facility required and its placement. She also gave an indication of the possible sources of funding and suggested sources which were unlikely to be productive in this respect

The Chairman summarised the decisions which ha been taken;

Mr Watson was to organise the test holes to be dug

The Hard Play area on Mr Scott�s plan was to be reduced

The fears of the local residents must be allayed

Mr Mullarkey was to be investigating the Toddler play area

The seat which had been vandalised was to be replaced and re-sited

The date of the next meeting was discussed but no date was fixed.

The meeting was closed at 11.30am.

A meeting of Heddon on the Wall Parish Council was held on Wednesday, 12th June 2002, in Heddon Library commencing at 7.30pm.

PRESENT Dr. Selman (Chairman), Mr. Armstrong, Mr. Young, Mr Watson, Mrs Thompson, Mrs. Cruickshank, Mr Iley, Borough Councillor Avery and the Clerk (Mr. T. Bates)

APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE

Apologies for absence were received from Mr Tailford and Mr Ayliffe, both on holiday

MINUTES OF THE LAST MEETING

The minutes of the Parish Council Meeting held on 8th May 2002 had been previously circulated. They were approved and signed after a minor correction

MATTERS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES

There were no matters arising from the minutes.

NEW CROSSING OF THE TYNE

Mr Greg Perks from N.C.C had come to the meeting to give the County Councils views on this project. Mr Armstrong gave a brief introduction to the subject and then Mr Perks carried on and gave the County Councils position. The Council had no immediate plans to pursue this project. Only a very minor study had been carried out. A full study, which would be required to move this scheme forward would be very costly and complicated and has not been sanctioned. The N.C.C has a five-year plan for road works which is currently in its second year. The budget for this plan is already set and allocated. and there were no funds available in this plan for even a study of Ovingham bridge to be carried out. For the next five-year plan this scheme would be one of a large number of schemes, and a scheme of this size would have to be allocated directly from central government. There was further discussion on this topic but the overall impression was that there was no prospect of this scheme going ahead for some considerable time yet. It would not be until the next LTP at the earliest. If and when it did get approval then it would be preceded by all of the necessary surveys and consultation. The current bridge is going to be inspected for safety.

The position with the Iron Sign Wylam crossroads link road was discussed. Mr Perks gave addresses and suggested that he was contacted at a later date and he would check on its current status.

DISTRICT REPORT

Councillor Avery gave the Castle Morpeth District Report. CMBC has had their AGM and the new Constitution had been adopted. This was a revised Committee system under which two Policy Committees made decisions which were then subject to examination by Scrutiny Committees. The Chairs of the Scrutiny Committees are held by Opposition members (i.e. Labour, Conservatives and Green). Mr Peter Wilson hief Executive Officer of CMBC is retiring in October/November. No decision has been taken as to the management structure, which will replace the current CEO, although there are several options being considered. A Joint Paper has been issued by all of the Council Leaders in Northumberland about the Regional Government White Paper. A formula has been agreed between the County and the District Councils. The main points of this are that all bodies wish to: -

Provide high quality services to the people of Northumberland.

Work closely together during the next phase of the White Paper

Maintain staff moral whilst the negotiations are proceeding

Ask the Boundary Commission about its Methodology.

There was a query regarding pensioner’s grass cutting. Councillor Avery agreed to follow this up. There had been little progress on the establishment of another re-cycling site, and there was further discussion on the possible location.

COUNTY REPORT

In the absence of Councillor Bentham there was no County Report.

ACCOUNTS

Received:

Donation, from Ladies Fellowship, Jubilee Fund £ 50.00

Donation from Masons, Jubilee Fund £ 25.00

Allotment Rents (all rents now collected) £ 30.00

Charibond Dividend, Village Trust £ 1.07

Charibond Dividend, Village Trust £ 57.28

Charifund Dividend, Village Trust £ 291.00

Donation, Ad Muram Singers, Jubilee Fund £ 25.00

Donation , Heddon in Bloom, Jubilee Fund £ 100.03

Ticket Sales, Jubilee Concert £ 194.00

Bank Interest, Bank of Ireland £ 254.60

To pay:-

Clerk’s Salary, Mr. T. Bates £ 300.00

Handyman, Mr. T. Evans £ 99.00

N.A.L.C. Subscriptions and Publications £ 193.81

Mr C Rand, milk for Jubilee Concert £ 3.24

Mr C. Rand, printing and posters for Jubilee functions £ 20.00

Mr C. Rand grass cutting June paid from Memorial Park Account £ 28.00

Mrs Tailford, flowers etc Jubilee events(already paid in cash) £ 19.00

Medals & Ribbons (Swan Jubilee celebrations) £ 185.00

Misc. Jubilee goods (Swan, Jubilee celebrations) £ 55.85

Misc Jubilee goods and services (Three Tuns) £ 127.63

Insurance, Parish Council Zurich Municipal Policy, 2002-2003 £ 1843.17

Halls of Heddon, plants for Memorial Park etc £ 280.80

Heddon Village Knott Memorial Hall, Hall Hire £ 16.00

These expenses were all agreed for payment

A cheque for £3670 was drawn on the Bank of Ireland to cover these expenses and the expected deficit on the Jubilee Celebration Fund.

PLANNING

Decisions

02/D/179, I. Moore, Holmside Farm, East Heddon, extension to provide a garden room. PERMITTED

02/D/238, B. Batey, 17, Station Road, Heddon on the Wall, Erection of a conservatory. PERMITTED.

02/D/267 E. Shanks & S. Morgan, 80, Trajan Walk, Heddon on the Wall, NZ 128 667

Extension to front of garage, demolition of rear of garage & utility room & erection of 2n bedrooms, sunroom and new kitchen PERMITTED

For Discussion

02/D/267 E. Shanks & S. Morgan, 80, Trajan Walk, Heddon on the Wall, NZ 128 667

Extension to front of garage, demolition of rear of garage & utility room & erection of 2no bedrooms, sunroom and new kitchen

02/D/269 K.J. O’Donnell, 292, Hexham Road, Heddon on the Wall NZ 143 669

Extension to provide garden room

02/D/272/273 A. Dixon, West Heddon Farm, Heddon on the Wall, NZ 122687, 123 686 Change of use of agricultural building to stabling. This application has been the subject of a CMBC Planning Committee meeting held on Tuesday, 11th June because of the depth of interest it has created. Mr Armstrong gave a brief resume of the events which lead up to the Parish Council withdrawing its objections to this development.

02/D/274 Mrs B. Donnison, 23, Military Road, Heddon on the Wall, NZ 132 670

Outline permission for 1 no. dwelling house

The above applications were discussed at the Planning Committee Meeting held on the 20th May 2002. The minutes of this meeting are included with these minutes

QUEEN’S JUBILEE CELEBRATIONS

The Chairman gave his congratulations to all of those concerned. Provisional accounts were presented and these indicated that the total deficit would be within the £1000 limit set at the meeting of 10th April 2002. It was agreed that the organisers should be congratulated on their efforts.

DOG WASTE BINS

Councillor Avery provided costs from CMBC for the provision of Dog Waste Bins. There was no Service Charge in with the costs as this has not yet been decided, although a figure of £120 per annum per bin had been suggested. It was decided to reserve judgement on this project until the Service Charge was available from CNBC. There was further discussion on the size of the bins and the frequency of the servicing.

DEVELOPMENTS ON THE WELFARE FIELD AND PROPOSED SPORTS FIELD

The newly formed Welfare Field Improvements Committee had met. Mr Gordon Stewart was elected as Chairman and Mr Dale Mullarkey as Vice Chairman. It was thought that this first meeting was very useful, as the Chairman was very interested in getting matters moving. It was thought to be important that the user groups in the village took the lead in these matters. The Chairman pointed out that of the houses bordering the Field at the Southern end one resident is cultivating the land between the fence and the wall (which is the correct boundary of the Welfare Field) with the consent of the Parish Council. The other resident also appears to be cultivating a similar area of land without permission. It was decided to contact this resident and attempt to formalise the situation. The possibility of digging exploratory boreholes to explore the drainage situation was discussed. It was agreed that this could go ahead.

N.C.C. Highways had been contacted to see if they would negotiate with Asset Management to obtain more land for the vehicular access. to the proposed sports field. No reply has been received to date. There was further discussion of the amount of land which could be required for the vehicular access.

PURCHASE OF NEW LITTER BINS FOR WELFARE FIELD MEMORIAL PARK AND METHODIST CHURCH BUS SHELTER

There had been a new outbreak of vandalism against village litter bins. Most now needed replacement. There was some discussion as to how to replace the bins. It was agreed to investigate the supply of concrete bins as these appeared to be reasonably vandal proof.

ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEAR 2001 – 2002

The accounts for the year 1st April 2001 to 31st March 2002 were presented. They were accepted as satisfactory after a few questions had been answered by the clerk.

DETR CONSULTATION PAPER ON THE LOCAL INVESTIGATION AND DETERMINATION OF MISCONDUCT CASES

This document had been received form the DETR. The Chairman decided to review it on behalf of the Council.

ALLOTMENTS

A quotation for £200 had been received for the replacement of the gate. It was decided to accept this figure. There was a serious rat problem on the allotments. CMBC would charge £50 per hour to deal with this with an estimate of a total cost of £100. It was decided to go ahead with this and deal with the rat problem.

APPOINTMENT OF AN INTERNAL AUDITOR

There was some considerable discussion over this appointment which was necessary from the point of view of the new "light touch" audit regime. A possible candidate was mentioned and he was to be contacted with a view to performing this function.

MEETING ORGANISED BY THE COMMUNITY COUNCIL ON FUNDING FOR WESTERN CMBC

A meeting was to be organised by the Northumberland Community Council dealing with funding sources for Western CMBC. There were volunteers to attend this meeting, as it might be relevant to the Welfare Field improvements.

CORRESPONDENCE

Archaeology in Northumberland

Re discover Northumberland

A 69 Roadlink Annual Report

City and County

A1 Multimodal Study Executive Report

These publications were all tabled.

ANY OTHER BUSINESS

English Nature have grants available for upto £10,000 for signs and other items for the Common. An application for a grant to place signs on the Common would be welcomed by English Nature. It was decided that a meeting of the Common Management Committee should be called to discuss this.

The holes and general condition of Trajan Walk was mentioned

The status of the "No Parking signs which have appeared in the shops car parking area was discussed. These signs cannot be enforced. It was decided to contact the police and the County authorities.

The condition and size of the Horsechestnut tree outside the shops was mentioned. It was decided to look at this in the autumn.

Horses depositing liquid faeces in Centurion Way were discussed. This was obviously an unsatisfactory state of affairs but it was outside of the Councils control.

The appearance of a large building in the grounds of Hillheads. CMBC had been contacted and would investigate.

There was some discussion on the lack of development at the Iron Sign. This had Planning Permission for an Organic Restaurant, but there appeared to have been little progress.

There was some discussion on the Local Improvements scheme for County Councillors. It was pointed out that this funding was not lost if it was not used. It rolls over into the next financial year. Some possibilities were mentioned but it was also pointed out that all schemes had to be Capital. schemes, and there was further discussion on the schemes which had already been suggested

The condition of footpaths in the village was raised. The paths were in bad condition being overgrown with weeds.

Leaflets for a new bus service running from Throckley. The possibility of running this service from Heddon was being investigated. There was discussion on the accessibility of the new surgery in Throckley.

A meeting of the Heddon on the Wall Parish Council Planning Committee was held on 25^th June, 2002 commencing at 9.30am, in the Green Room of the Knott Memorial Hall.

PRESENT: Planning Committee Members Dr. B.J. Selman (Chairman), Mr. B. Mr I Armstrong..Other Councillors ; Mrs H. Thompson, Mrs Cruickshank (later), Mr Ayliffe

APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE.

Apologies were received from Mr Iley

MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING

These had been approved at the full Parish Council Meeting held on the 12^th June 2002

APPLICATIONS

02/D/350, G.A. Innes-Smith, Heddon Steads Farm, Heddon on the Wall

Erection of a steel framed agricultural building for cattle housing and milking parlour with open silage clamp

This application was discussed at length. Concerns were expressed over the closeness to the road of this new building. The structure involved an overhang and there was some doubt as to whether the edge of the development shown on the plans represented the overhang or the main body of the building with the overhang as extra. In view of the problems which appear to be associated with the access along this lane and the closeness of the development to the sharp bend in the lane it was recommended that the CMBC Planning Authorities take a very close look at this proposal and examine it from all aspects.

02/D/355 A & K Watson, Heddon Banks Farm, Heddon on the Wall

Change of use of agricultural land to rear of 12, Station Road to a residential garden

Mr Watson was present initially and gave the Committee a brief history of the site and his intentions. He then left the meeting and he was not present for any of the subsequent deliberations

The Committee spent some considerable time debating this proposal. Overall the Committee felt that this was an undesirable development. The amenities presently enjoyed by both 12 and 14 Station Road were an important aspect of those residences and these must be preserved. The Committee was fully aware of the difficulties encountered with restrictions in other situations and thought that this approach was undesirable. Concern was also expressed over the possibility of further development and the Committee wished to ensure that such future development could not occur.

Notwithstanding the difficulties which had been encountered in the past the Committee wished to ensure that if this application was granted then severe restrictions as to the type of structures, fences, plants etc which could be placed in or grown in the garden would be enforced. Ideally a mutually agreed covenant between all of the potential parties involved would be required, but CMBC Planning Authority would be the final arbitrator on this matter. The possibility of a covenant between the applicant and the neighbours was also discussed. This could have several advantages.

The Committee was in favour of refusing this application.

02/D/367, T-Mobile (UK) Ltd, Heddon View farm, Heddon on the Wall NZ 145 680

Erection of 15m high slimline monopole mast with antennae, microwave dish, equipment cabinet and ancillary works.

The Committee discussed this proposal. It was felt that in the recent past a precedent had been set for this type of equipment to be sited on Electricity pylons, thus avoiding the proliferation of masts. It was thought that if this could be carried out in this case then it should be. If however there really was no alternative then there were no objections